June 2009


Two papers have recently been published on Iridium complexes incorporating acetylacetone and C-N based bidentate ligands. One paper is published in Chem Comm, by a European based group, the other is in Advance Materials by a collaboration out of China and Hong Kong.

The european group reports an octahedral compound (termed N966) with three ligands; 2 phenylimidazoles (coordinating to the Ir through a C and a N on the imidazole) and 1 acetylacetone. In solutions of DCM, at room temperature, it displays broad unstructured emission over the spectral range of 440nm – 800nm, centered around 570nm. It exhibits a PLQY (quantum yield) of 1.5% and radiative lifetime of almost 2μs. CV of the compound in DMSO exhibits reversible oxidation and reduction.
Bolink, H., De Angelis, F., Baranoff, E., Klein, C., Fantacci, S., Coronado, E., Sessolo, M., Kalyanasundaram, K., Grätzel, M., & Nazeeruddin, M. (2009). White-light phosphorescence emission from a single molecule: application to OLED Chemical Communications DOI: 10.1039/b908946b

The group in asia report of a polymer white LED (PWLED), created by doping blue light emitting iridium complexes with yellow iridium complexes, incorporating an electron-transporting material as well!

Wu, H., Zhou, G., Zou, J., Ho, C., Wong, W., Yang, W., Peng, J., & Cao, Y. (2009). Efficient Polymer White-Light-Emitting Devices for Solid-State Lighting Advanced Materials DOI: 10.1002/adma.200900638

These two papers illustrate the different approaches to the WOLEY grail :) I prefer the purer approach as I think it will ultimately result in a higher quality of fabricated devices, but I also appreciate that this approach will require a lot of trial and error….which is why I’m glad I’m not doing the research!

abc © interestedinscience.com

ResearchBlogging.org

In the interests of science, humanity, and making an honest-to-god attempt at total political transparency – I ask: what the hell is going on?!?! I’m reading that obama’s administration has decided to devastate the H-cell research field by cutting its budget by $100 million. AAAGGHH! (Being an eternal cynic I’m scared that where america lead the UK may follow…)

I’m british, and as such couldn’t vote in November. Needless to say that Obama received my ‘virtual’ vote. I was happy to hear he was for more funding for stem-cell research and against the war in iraq – these were the notions of a sane and well balanced, academically informed and astute leader. WOOP! The most powerful man in the world is behaving like one.

And now I read in Science (see citation below) that Steven Chu (dept energy sec) doesnt see H-cells as having a viable future.

Not wishing to hamper my attempts at reasoning, but even a four year old watching Top Gear last season can see the enormous step forward being made (or, now at least, hampered)

Or just read the paper below if you can follow the link.

A car has always been a continual mode of transport, by that I mean something that go from A to B, then to C, then to D, E, F, G…. and so on, refilling as it goes. Battery power doesn’t allow for this. Charges can take over night.

Hydrogen Fuel cell technology will get better – but not without funding.

Service, R. (2009). Hydrogen Cars: Fad or the Future? Science, 324 (5932), 1257-1259 DOI: 10.1126/science.324_1257

ResearchBlogging.org